Time-to-Revenue: The One Metric That Makes or Breaks Mining Tech Startups
Why It's the Make-or-Break Metric — Tactics to Accelerate It, Plus 3 Case Studies: Plotlogic, KoBold, and Jetti Resources.
In the modern-day gold rush for mining technology, one factor often determines which startups strike it rich and which run out of fuel: time-to-revenue. Whoever shortens that gap is the one who wins the future.
Although mining accounts for approximately 10% of global GDP, the sector has historically attracted minimal venture capital interest. In 2023, just 0.23% of global venture funding was directed toward mining-related startups—a stark gap, roughly ten times smaller than the sector's economic weight.
This disparity stems largely from a fundamental misalignment: venture capital typically operates on 5- to 10-year timelines, expecting strong traction or exit within that window, whereas mining technologies often require just as long to reach large-scale adoption.
Mining is frequently compared to sectors like oil & gas or aerospace due to its long development cycles and substantial capital requirements. Yet, even among deep tech industries, mining stands out for the slow pace at which innovation is adopted. Unlike software startups that can iterate rapidly, mining ventures must navigate physical trials in remote, often harsh environments, strict safety and environmental regulations, and resistance from incumbents deeply rooted in legacy processes.
For founders, patience is essential—but also dangerous.
The longer it takes to demonstrate results, the greater the risk of falling into the notorious “valley of death,” where funding and interest fade before a product reaches commercial viability.
Today, as mining emerges as a cornerstone of the energy transition and demand for critical minerals surges, the opportunity is enormous—but so is the execution risk. While venture capital is beginning to take notice, its short-term investment horizons remain fundamentally mismatched with the industry’s long-term realities. The result is a persistent paradox: global urgency collides with commercial delay.
This analysis draws on a collection of unique expert perspectives, complemented by insights from reports, academic literature, and best practice frameworks.
It examines how Time-to-Revenue influences value creation timelines in capital-intensive sectors, presenting a set of practical strategies to accelerate it, refine its design with precision, and highlight the most widely adopted business models. Investors’ Perspective: Evaluating Time-to-Revenue and Startup Viability
Finally, we examine three companies—Plotlogic, KoBold, and Jetti Resources—that represent three distinct approaches to tackling the Time-to-Revenue challenge.
Table of Contents:
Why Time-to-Revenue Is the Make-or-Break Metric
Tactics to Shorten Time-to-Revenue
Investors’ Perspective: Evaluating the Timeline of Investable Events
Case Studies
Conclusion
✨ This Analysis is Reserved for Our Premium Members
To read it, unlock The Scenarionist Premium today.
Becoming a Premium Member of The Scenarionist means you also get full access to our complete archive of Deep Tech intelligence, actionable Playbooks, rigorous VC Guides, and founder-ready strategies you won’t find anywhere else — all based on our independent research, original deep dives, and exclusive insights with the world’s top Deep Tech experts.
If you’re serious about Deep Tech and want a real edge in practical knowledge and strategic thinking, The Scenarionist Premium is the one resource you can’t afford to miss.
👉 Join The Scenarionist Premium today — and level up your Deep Tech advantage!
1. Why Time-to-Revenue Is the Make-or-Break Metric
In mining tech, time-to-revenue often emerges as a